| Rose Bird ProCon.org | BACK | 
| Conflict Highlights |  (Click to enlarge) Cover of Sep. 1986 booklet, Should Chief Justice Rose Bird Be Re-Confirmed In The Upcoming November 4, 1986 California Election? | 
| The pro/con statements below indicate the great depth of disparity in the Rose Bird debate, and to our core question, "Should Chief Justice Rose Bird be Reconfirmed (in the 11/4/96 California Election)?" | 
| Pro Rose Bird | Con Rose Bird | |
| 1. | Chief Justice Bird voted with the majority of the court 94.8% of the time in reversing 55 of 58 death penalty cases. | Chief Justice Bird has voted to reverse 100% of the 58 death penalty cases reviewed by the California Supreme Court. | 
| 2. | The California Supreme Court has upheld convictions in more than 90% of all criminal appeals since Chief Justice Bird joined the court. | Between 1977 and 1982 Chief Justice Bird handed down verdicts that favored the defendant in about 75% of the cases reviewed by the court. | 
| 3. | Chief Justice Bird is a thoughtful, thorough jurist. | Chief Justice Bird's decisions are too often based on personal bias. | 
| 4. | Chief Justice Bird has been widely praised for her administrative competence. | Chief Justice Bird's administration of the court has been poor. | 
| 5. | Six of 15 U.S. Supreme Court Chief Justices, including the highly regarded Earl Warren, had no prior judicial experience. | Prior to her appointment to the California Supreme Court, Chief Justice Bird had no judicial experience. | 
| TOP | CLOSE |